+- NaaLaa (https://www.naalaa.com/forum)
+-- Forum: NaaLaa (https://www.naalaa.com/forum/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: NaaLaa 7 Code (https://www.naalaa.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: Calculating 10000 digits of Pi (/thread-71.html)
Calculating 10000 digits of Pi - Tomaaz - 02-07-2024
OK. I know this is not the kind of program NaaLaa has been created for, but I use it to test the speed of any language I try. Well, NaaLaa is doing a pretty good job here and runing this example as fast as other fast interpreters.
Code:
n = 35001
a = 10000
d = 0
k = 0
g = 0
l = 0
f = []
for x = 0 to n
f[x] = 2000
next
for c = n to 14 step -14
d = 0
for b = c to 1 step -1
d = d * b
g = b * 2 - 1
d = d + f[b] * a
f[b] = d % g
d = floor(d / g)
k = l + floor(d / a)
next
k2 = right("0000" + k, 4)
write k
l = d % a
nextEDIT: On my machine it takes about 1 min. to complete the task and this is the speed I'm expecting from an interpreted language. Python is slightly faster, while Perl being 25% faster than Python. Tcl is 10+ times slower than NaaLaa. It's worth to remember that NaaLaa runs through Wine, while Python, Perl and Tcl run natively.
RE: Calculating 10000 digits of Pi - johnno56 - 02-07-2024
Varies a little on my machine... averages between 15 and 21 seconds. Preventing the "text" being displayed made little to no difference in the running times... but still cool...
RE: Calculating 10000 digits of Pi - Tomaaz - 02-08-2024
You definitely have a more powerful hardware. Preventing text from being displayed will not help here as the inner loop takes the most time in this example.
RE: Calculating 10000 digits of Pi - 1micha.elok - 02-12-2024
I added some lines at the bottom of the codes to measure it.
Code:
pln "It took "+clock()/1000+" seconds"
pln
pln "Press ENTER to quit"
temp=rln() 'pauseOn my computer, it took 30 seconds. ... My machine is slower than Johnno's
