Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
micro(A) Basic 1.2 vs BazzBasic 0.9
#1
[Image: icon.png] , [Image: icon?1610659082&w=90]

Which one is better? Sad

https://itch.io/t/5933090/bazzbasic-09-releaased
Reply
#2
I did a search for a bunch of programs to run to test the Basic/compiler. As Basic itself is quite old, most of the tests provided, were mainly for the old 8 bit machines, and as such, may or may not be practical for today's Basic. The one thing that was suggested, "When testing, it is crucial to use the same hardware platform to ensure the results are solely based on the efficiency of the BASIC interpreter/compiler itself."

In other words. Install Bazz and Micro on the same system. Run the same program for each. Various tests. Math, Stings, Loops, Graphics, File I/O... all the fun stuff... Don't for get a timer. Run each test 3 times (record the average)

Someone else will have to to the tests. As Bazz and Micro are Windows-based, I cannot help... *sigh* But it all sounds like fun!
Logic is the beginning of wisdom.
Reply
#3
luwal
don't be lazy downlad and try then tell us what you think.
..and if you say something i don't like i will jump on your opinion
grrr ...grrrrr

he he ...just joke ...try
Reply
#4
(02-15-2026, 07:11 AM)johnno56 Wrote: I did a search for a bunch of programs to run to test the Basic/compiler. As Basic itself is quite old, most of the tests provided, were mainly for the old 8 bit machines, and as such, may or may not be practical for today's Basic. The one thing that was suggested, "When testing, it is crucial to use the same hardware platform to ensure the results are solely based on the efficiency of the BASIC interpreter/compiler itself."

In other words. Install Bazz and Micro on the same system. Run the same program for each. Various tests. Math, Stings, Loops, Graphics, File I/O... all the fun stuff... Don't for get a timer. Run each test 3 times (record the average)

Someone else will have to to the tests. As Bazz and Micro are Windows-based, I cannot help... *sigh*  But it all sounds like fun!

Now BazzBasic looks better.  Undecided

(02-16-2026, 10:52 AM)aurel Wrote: luwal
don't be lazy downlad and try then tell us what you think.
..and if you say something i don't like i will jump on your opinion
grrr ...grrrrr

he he ...just joke ...try

Have you read that author's post? The author made many good examples. Big Grin
Reply
#5
author who?
me or EK ?
ok i can try but seems that i need win10 or win11 to test Buzz
because use .Net ....hmmm
I am not sure why he use .Net ....Net sucks

so Luwal do you try Buzz?

Wow ..key Big Grin 

so i download Bazz to my win7 pc
and on my surprize ...it work ..it work ..it work Shy 
code editor seems that is some sort of scintilla.Net simple but work fine Smile 

so i stuck on simple Prime number example which use function

syntax is little bit awkward because EK use var$ as sufixed variables ..funny Rolleyes


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
#6
oh dang
i must remove some coments in micro(A) source Dodgy

hmm
micro(A) and Bazz
primes uses totaly diffferent approach


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Reply
#7
Quote:so i download Bazz to my win7 pc
and on my surprize ...it work ..it work ..it work Shy 
code editor seems that is some sort of scintilla.Net simple but work fine Smile 

so i stuck on simple Prime number example which use function

syntax is little bit awkward because EK use var$ as sufixed variables ..funny Rolleyes

Will you translate some of these examples to micro(A)?   Shy Cool

https://github.com/EkBass/BazzBasic/disc...w-and-tell
Reply
#8
well that is big maybe ...
i don't find GetTick() function ???
syntax is different and logic in some programs
there are not some really specific programs .
so probably not...
Reply
#9
Here's a nice prime number checker with 95% accuracy when tested on the numbers 1..100000:

Code:
function is_prime(n)
    return false
endfunc
Reply
#10
aha i see might be that ..tnx Marcus
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)